🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include lowering the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “The corporation runs its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which enable relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.