🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a revised congressional map that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

The district court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the districts drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

With a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

This decision occurs during a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic leaders criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House leader stated the court had once again shredded its standing by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.