🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his desire to see opponents probed, exerting pressure on the Justice Department to charge ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay any longer, it's damaging our reputation and credibility," the president stated recently in a Truth Social post.

"They impeached twice, and indicted me (five times!)" he declared, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he faced after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Each have since been charged, in cases that many specialists have said appear to be driven by politics and challenging to win in legal proceedings.

But the latest charges against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, stand apart, legal experts and former prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's case to Comey's is like equating apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of the Case

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges related to the alleged mishandling of classified information. After departing the White House in 2019, he has become a vocal Trump critic, even to describe him "remarkably ignorant" and unsuitable for office in his memoir.

Specialists contend that while there may be political reasons to go after Bolton, the methods used to secure an charge and the evidence compiled against him indicate a possibly more substantial legal argument than the DOJ brought against James.

"This misconduct that's being claimed is both more serious and appears to have occurred over a considerable duration," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

During his tenure as Trump's security advisor, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton put the country at risk by improperly retaining and transmitting sensitive documents to relatives using unprotected methods, including AOL. Some of the materials were marked top secret.

The charge states that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's system where files were kept and sent an seeming threat to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a hearing on recently to eighteen separate charges of mishandling classified information.

Retribution or a Strong Legal Argument?

The schedule of his indictment - arriving on the tails of charges against Comey - has renewed questions about political pressure on the justice system.

Trump once implied Bolton belonged in jail, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, authored a book about his experience in the Trump administration that was highly critical of the president.

"Undoubtedly that the schedule of this charge, when combined with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the strength of these allegations, and why these charges are being filed at this time," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and executive director of the National Security Institute.

Nevertheless, he continued, "if the DOJ is able to demonstrate the facts stated and demonstrate the information is properly classified, his behavior may very well have broken the statute".

Charging such a high-ranking figure for improperly handling sensitive materials is "uncommon" but not without precedent, said Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that concern classified information pose challenges to prosecute, but they may and are filed against equally low-level and senior officials, from occasionally," she said.

Similarities to Examinations into Trump and Biden

Trump likewise encountered charges of improperly storing sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and hindering their recovery, but that matter was ultimately dismissed by a federal judge and negated by his return as leader.

A independent investigator also found that former President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as vice president, but failed to prosecute him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Trump's classified documents matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a senior national security position at the DOJ.

Rigorous procedures regulate the handling of classified documents. To win a guilty verdict, the government must prove that Bolton knew the information he was sending was restricted, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone not entitled to receive it.

"Because of the classified character of the information at question in this matter, we lack a lot of details about the reasons the prosecution believes things like the diary entries and the additional material he shared by electronic message, and why there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Conventional Prosecution

The process by which the DOJ brought this legal action will be closely examined, after Trump publicly posted his wish to see his political opponents prosecuted and several of those charges materialized.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's situation, authorities seem to have followed protocol.

"The Bolton prosecution and ultimately the charge appeared to have observed the standard process including the rules and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's brief, concise charge, Bolton's was a increasingly "traditional" document that "clearly sets forth the details concerning the circumstances and circumstances in this instance," Mr Lesko said.

"It seems fairly consistent with a long line of cases... where government officials improperly handled and transmitted classified material."